Wilcox k-ω Model
Since all three k-ε turbulence models cannot be integrated all the way to walls, wall damping wall functions must be employed to provide correct near wall behavior. It is also known that the standard k-ε turbulence model fails to predict the flow separation under adverse pressure gradients.
Wilcox proposed a turbulence model similar to the standard k-ε turbulence model but replaced the dissipation rate (ε) equation with the eddy frequency (ω) equation (Wilcox, 2006; Wilcox, 2008). The eddy frequency (ω) is often referred to the specific dissipation rate and is defined as . The Wilcox k-ω turbulence model has an advantage over the k-ε turbulence model as the k-ω model does not require any wall functions for the calculation of the velocity distribution near walls. As a result, the k-ω turbulence model has better performance for flows with adverse pressure gradient when compared to the k-ε turbulence models. However, the k-ω model exhibits a strong sensitivity to the freestream boundary condition (Wilcox, 2006) for external flow applications.
Transport Equations
Turbulent Kinetic Energy k
Eddy Frequency (Specific Dissipation Rate) ω
Production Modeling
Turbulent Kinetic Energy k
Eddy Frequency ω
where , , , , , ,
Dissipation Modeling
Turbulent Kinetic Energy (k)
Eddy Frequency (ω)
Modeling of Turbulent Viscosity
where , , ,
Model Coefficients
= 0.6, = 0.5, = 0.09, = 0.0708, = 0.4, .